decapentaplegic
Regulation in genital disc In both sexes, the Drosophila genital disc contains the
female and male genital primordia. The sex determination
gene doublesex controls which of these primordia will
develop and which will be repressed. In females, the
presence of DoublesexF product results in the development
of the female genital primordium and repression of the
male primordium. In males, the presence of DoublesexM
product results in the development and repression of the
male and female genital primordia, respectively. This
report shows that DoublesexF prevents the induction of
decapentaplegic by Hedgehog in the repressed male
primordium of female genital discs, whereas DoublesexM
blocks the Wingless pathway in the repressed female
primordium of male genital discs. It is also shown that
DoublesexF is continuously required during female larval
development to prevent activation of decapentaplegic in the
repressed male primordium, and during pupation for
female genital cytodifferentiation. In males, however, it
seems that DoublesexM is not continuously required during
larval development for blocking the Wingless signaling
pathway in the female genital primordium. Furthermore,
DoublesexM does not appear to be needed during pupation
for male genital cytodifferentiation. Using dachshund as a
gene target for Decapentaplegic and Wingless signals, it
was also found that DoublesexM and DoublesexF both
positively and negatively control the response to these
signals in male and female genitalia, respectively. A model
is presented for the dimorphic sexual development of the
genital primordium in which both DoublesexM and
DoublesexF products play positive and negative roles (Sanchez, 2001).
dpp is expressed in the growing male genital primordium of male
genital discs but not in the repressed male primordium (RMP) of female genital discs. This suggests that the developing or repressed status of the male genital
primordium is determined by the regulation of dpp expression. As
dsx controls the developmental status of the male genital
primordium, and the expression of dpp depends on the Hh signal,
the relationship between the Hh signal cascade and
dsx in the control of RMP development was examined. To this end, a twin clonal
analysis for the loss-of-function tra2 mutation was performed in
tra2/+ female genital discs. In this way, the
proliferation and the induction of dpp expression was examined in the clones
homozygous for tra2 (male genetic constitution) and that of the
twin wild-type clones, both in the repressed male and the growing
female primordia. Recall that the
effects of tra2 in the genital disc are entirely mediated by its role
in the splicing of DSX RNA: the presence or absence of functional
Tra2 product gives rise to the production of female DsxF or male
DsxM product, respectively. Clones for tra2
(expressing DsxM) induced in the RMP of female genital discs
show overgrowth and are always associated with dpp
expression, indicating that the lower proliferation shown
by the RMP is probably caused by the absence of dpp expression.
This activation of dpp is restricted to only certain parts of the
clone and never overlaps with Wg expression. Since wg is
normally expressed in the RMP, the possibility exists that the cells
that do not express dpp in the clone are expressing wg, owing
to their antagonistic interaction. Double staining of Wg and Dpp
in tra2 clones reveals an expansion of the normal domain of wg
expression that abuts the dpp-expressing cells (Sanchez, 2001).
In the RMP, the two sister clones are different in size: the tra2
clone (male genetic constitution) is bigger than the wild-type
twin clone (female genetic constitution). In contrast, when the
clones are induced in the growing female genital primordium,
both of them are of a similar size. Moreover, the pattern of dpp
expression does not change in the tra2 cells induced in this
primordium (Sanchez, 2001).
optomotor-blind, a target of the Dpp pathway,
also responds to Dpp in the genital disc. Since dpp is de-repressed in tra2 clones induced in the RMP, the activation of omb was monitored in these clones. The activation of dpp in tra2 clones induces the expression of this target gene, whose function is required for the
development of specific male genital structures. It is concluded that
DsxF product prevents the induction of Dpp by Hh in the repressed
male genital primordium of female genital discs (Sanchez, 2001).
In the male genital disc, which has DsxM product, the low
proliferation rate of the repressed female primordium (RFP) cannot be attributed to a lack of dpp
or wg, since both genes are expressed in this primordium.
Failure to respond to the Dpp signal may also be ruled out
because the RFP expresses the Dpp downstream gene, omb, indicating that the Dpp pathway is active in this primordium. However, Dll, a target gene for both Wg and Dpp, is not expressed in the RFP but is expressed in the developing
female primordium of female genital discs. This
suggests that the Wg pathway cannot activate some of its targets
in the RFP. Thus, the analysis of dsx1 mutant genital discs, where
both male and female genital primordia develop, becomes
relevant. These mutant discs show neither DsxM nor DsxF
products. The female genital primordium of these discs now
expresses Dll. It is concluded that DsxM controls the
response to the Wg pathway in the RFP of male genital discs (Sanchez, 2001).
The gene dachsund (dac) is also a target of
the Hh pathway in the leg and antenna.
In the present study, it was found that dac is differentially
expressed in female and male genital discs. In the female genital
discs, which have DsxF product, dac expression mostly coincides
with that of wg in both the growing female primordium and the
RMP. In contrast, in male genital discs, which have
DsxM product, dac is not similarly expressed to wg but its
expression partially overlaps that of dpp and no expression is
observed in the RFP. In pkA minus clones, which
autonomously activate Wg and Dpp signals in a complementary
pattern, dac was ectopically expressed only in mutant pkA minus cells
at or close to the normal dac expression domains in male and
female genital discs. In pkA minus;dpp minus double
clones, which express wg, dac is not ectopically induced in the
male primordium of the male genital disc, but is still ectopically
induced in both the growing female genital primordium and the
RMP of female genital disc. Conversely, in pkA minus wg minus
double clones, which express dpp, dac is not ectopically
induced in the growing female or in the RMP of female genital
discs, but is ectopically induced in the growing male
primordium of the male genital disc. These results
indicate that dac responds differently to Wg and Dpp signals in
both sexes (Sanchez, 2001).
In dsxMas/+ intersexual genital discs, which have
both DsxM and DsxF products, and in dsx1 intersexual genital discs, which have neither DsxM nor DsxF products, dac is expressed in Wg and Dpp domains although at lower
levels than in normal male and female genital discs. These
results suggest that DsxM plays opposing, positive and negative
roles in dac expression in male and female genital discs,
respectively; and that DsxF plays opposing, positive and
negative roles in dac expression in female and male genital
discs, respectively. To test this hypothesis, tra2 clones (which
express only DsxM ) were induced in female genital discs. The
expression of dac is repressed in tra2 clones located in Wg
territory. Therefore, DsxF positively
regulates dac expression in the Wg domain, and DsxM
negatively regulates dac expression in this domain, otherwise
dac would be expressed in tra2 clones at the low levels found
in dsx intersexual genital discs. However, when the tra2 clones
are induced in the RMP, in the territory competent to activate
dpp, they show ectopic expression of dac (Sanchez, 2001).
Therefore, DsxM positively regulates dac expression in the Dpp
domain, whereas DsxF negatively regulates dac expression in
this domain, since in normal female genital discs with DsxF dac is
not expressed in Dpp territory. This is further supported by the
induction of dac in the Wg domain and repression of dac in the
Dpp domain by ectopic expression of DsxF in the male genital
primordium of male genital discs. It is concluded that
in male genital discs, DsxM positively and negatively regulates
dac expression in Dpp and Wg domains, respectively; and in
female genital discs, DsxF positively and negatively regulates
dac expression in Wg and Dpp domains, respectively (Sanchez, 2001).
Homozygous tra2ts larvae with two X-chromosomes develop
into female or male adults if reared at 18°C or 29°C,
respectively, because at 18°C they produce DsxF and at 29°C
they produce DsxM. A shift in the temperature of the culture is
accompanied by a change in the sexual pathway of tra2ts larvae. Analysis of the growth of genital primordia
and their capacity to differentiate adult structures of tra2ts flies was performed using pulses between the male- and the
female-determining temperatures in both directions during
development (Sanchez, 2001).
Regardless of the stage in development at which the
female-determining temperature pulse was given (transitory
presence of functional Tra2ts product; i.e. transitory presence
of DsxF product and absence of DsxM product), the male
genital disc develops normal male adult genital structures and
not female ones. This occurs even if the pulse is applied
during pupation. Pulses of 24 hours at the
male-determining temperature (temporal absence of functional
Tra2 ts product; i.e. transitory absence of DsxF product and
presence of DsxM product) before the end of first larval stage
produces female and not male genital structures.
However, later pulses always give rise to male genital
structures, except when close to pupation.
Further, the capacity of the female genital disc to differentiate
adult genital structures is also reduced when the temperature
pulse is applied during metamorphosis (Sanchez, 2001).
When the effect of the male-determining temperature pulses
was analyzed in the genital disc, it was found that overgrowth
of the RMP is always associated with the activation of dpp
in this primordium. However, this activation and the associated
overgrowth only occurs when the temperature pulse is
given after the end of first larval instar. This
suggests that there is a time requirement for induction of dpp (Sanchez, 2001).
The activation of this gene in the RMP and the cell proliferation
resumed by this primordium, as well as its capacity to
differentiate adult structures is irreversible, because they are
maintained when the larvae are returned to the female-determining
temperature, which is when functional Tra2ts
product is again available (i.e. the presence of DsxF product and
absence of DsxM product).
This time requirement for induction of dpp is also supported
by the fact that dsx11 clones (which lack DsxM) induce
differentiated normal male adult genital structures in the
developing male genital primordium of XY; dsx11/+ male genital
discs (which express only DsxM ) after 24 hours of development. However, when the dsx11 clones are induced in the
time period between 0 and 24 hours of development, they do
not differentiate normally and give rise to incomplete adult male
genital structures. This different developmental
capacity shown by the dsx11 clones depending on their induction
time is explained as follows. When the clones are induced after
24 hours of development, dpp is already activated. Indeed,
these clones show no change in the expression pattern of dpp
or their targets. Accordingly, these clones
display normal proliferation and capacity to differentiate male
adult genital structures. However, when the clones are induced
early in development, dpp is not yet activated, since this gene is
not expressed in the male genital primordium of male genital
discs early in development. Therefore,
when the male genital disc reaches the state in development
when dpp is induced, the cells that form the clones activate this
gene as in dsx mutant intersexual flies because the clones have
neither DsxM nor DsxF products. Consequently, these clones do
not achieve a normal proliferation rate, and then do not
differentiate normal adult male genital structures (Sanchez, 2001).
As described above, it has been shown that dsx regulates the expression of gene dac. Recall that in male genital discs, DsxM positively and
negatively regulates dac expression in Dpp and Wg domains,
respectively; and in female genital discs, DsxF positively and
negatively regulates dac expression in Wg and Dpp domains,
respectively. The expression of the gene dac was analyzed in
genital discs of tra2ts flies using pulses between the male- and
the female-determining temperatures in both directions. It was
found that the dac expression pattern switches from a 'female
type' to a 'male type' when male-determining temperature
pulses were applied to tra2ts larvae after first larval instar. Note that dac expression is reduced in the Wg
domain of the RMP and is progressively activated in the Dpp
domain. It should be remembered that these pulses lead to the
transient presence of DsxM instead of DsxF product. Thus,
these results are consistent with the previously proposed
suggestion that DsxM activates dac in the Dpp domain and
represses it in the Wg domain (again the converse is true for
DsxF). When the pulse is given during first larval instar, dac
is not activated in the Dpp domain of RMP, in
spite of the fact that there is also a transient presence of DsxM
instead of DsxF. This is explained by the lack of competence
of cells to express Dpp, which is acquired after first larval instar. When the tra2ts larvae reach such a
developmental stage, these cells now produce DsxF because
they have returned to the female-determining temperature (Sanchez, 2001).
DsxF prevents activation of dpp in the RMP, and consequently
no induction of dac expression occurs. In the female genital
primordium, dac expression is strongly reduced in
the Wg domain and absent in the Dpp domain.
Taken together, these results suggest that the development of
male and female genital primordia have different time
requirements for DsxM and DsxF products (Sanchez, 2001).
dsx controls which of the two genital primordia will develop
and which will be repressed. Nevertheless, since it is expressed in
each cell, another gene(s) is required to distinguish between
the female and the male genitalia. The female genitalia develop
from eighth abdominal segment and the male genitalia develop
from ninth abdominal segment. It is also known that Abdominal-B (Abd-B)
is responsible for the specification of these posterior
segments. It has been
proposed that the development of the male and female genitalia
requires the concerted action of Abd-B and dsx, and that these
two genes control proliferation of each genital primordium
through the expression, either directly or indirectly, of dpp and
wg. Abd-B produces two different
proteins: Abd-Bm and Abd-Br. Abd-Bm is present only in the
female genital primordium, whereas Abd-Br is present only in
the male genital primordium.
It is proposed that DsxM and DsxF combine with Abd-Bm
and Abd-Br to make up the signals that determine the dimorphic
sexual development of the genital disc. In the absence
of both DsxM and DsxF products (dsx intersexes), there is a basal expression of dpp and a basal functional level of the Wg signaling
pathway in both male and female genital primordia. In females, the
concerted signal made up of DsxF and Abd-Br cause repression of
the development of the male genital primordium by preventing the
expression of dpp, resulting in the RMP of female genital discs. In
males, the concerted signal formed by DsxM and Abd-Bm
represses the female genital primordium by blocking the Wg
signaling pathway, giving rise to the RFP of male genital discs. It
is further proposed that DsxM plus Abd-Br increase dpp expression
in the male genital primordium of male genital discs, and that DsxF
plus Abd-Bm enhance Wg signaling pathway function in the
female genital primordium of female genital discs. A similar
mechanism of modulation of Dpp and Wg responses has been
described for the shaping of haltere development by Ultrabithorax. Therefore, DsxM would play a positive
and a negative role in male and female genital primordia,
respectively, whereas DsxF would play a positive and a negative
role in female and male genital primordia, respectively. This
positive role of both Dsx products serves to explain the expression
of dpp and the function of the Wg signaling pathway in growing
male and female genital primordia, respectively, in dsx Mas/+
intersexual flies, where both genital primordia simultaneously have
DsxM and DsxF. Otherwise, dpp would not be expressed in the male genital primordium and the Wg signaling pathway would not
be functional in the female genital primordium, as occurs in normal
female and male genital discs. If so, this would mean that the two
genital primordia of these intersexual genital discs would be kept
in the repressed state and would not develop. Contrary to
observations, this would result in a lack of male and female adult
genital structures in these intersexes (Sanchez, 2001).
The Drosophila ovary is an attractive system to study how niches
control stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. The niche for germline
stem cells (GSCs) provides a Dpp/Bmp signal, which is essential for GSC
maintenance. bam is both necessary and sufficient for the
differentiation of immediate GSC daughters (cystoblasts). Bmp
signals directly repress bam transcription in GSCs in the
Drosophila ovary. Similar to dpp, gbb encodes another Bmp
niche signal that is essential for maintaining GSCs. The expression of
phosphorylated Mad (pMad), a Bmp signaling indicator, is restricted to GSCs and some cystoblasts, which have repressed bam expression. Both Dpp and Gbb signals contribute to pMad production. bam transcription is upregulated in GSCs mutant for dpp and gbb. In marked GSCs mutant for two essential Bmp signal
transducers (Med and punt) bam transcription is also elevated. Finally, Med and Mad are shown to directly bind to the bam silencer in vitro. This
study demonstrates that Bmp signals maintain the undifferentiated or
self-renewal state of GSCs, and directly repress bam expression in
GSCs by functioning as short-range signals. Thus, niche signals directly
repress differentiation-promoting genes in stem cells in order to maintain
stem cell self-renewal (Song, 2004).
This study reveals a new function for gbb in the regulation of GSCs in the Drosophila ovary. Loss of gbb function leads
to GSC differentiation and stem cell loss, similar to dpp mutants.
gbb is expressed in somatic cells but not in germ cells, suggesting
that gbb is another niche signal that controls GSC maintenance. Like dpp, gbb contributes to the production of pMad in GSCs and also functions to repress bam expression in GSCs. As in the wing imaginal disc, gbb also probably functions to augment the dpp signal in the regulation of GSCs through common receptors in the Drosophila ovary. In both dpp and gbb mutants, pMad accumulation in GSCs is severely reduced but not completely diminished. Since the dpp or gbb mutants used in this study do not carry complete loss-of-function mutations, it remains possible that complete elimination of either dpp or gbb function is sufficient for eradicating pMad accumulation in GSCs. Alternatively, both dpp and gbb signaling are required independently for full pMad accumulation in GSCs, and thus disrupting either one of them only partially diminishes pMad accumulation in GSCs. The lethality of null dpp and gbb mutants, and the
difficulty in completely removing their function in the adult ovary, prevent these possibilities from being tested directly (Song, 2004).
Interestingly, dpp overexpression results in complete suppression of cystoblast differentiation and complete repression of bam transcription in the germ cells, whereas gbb overexpression does not have obvious effects on cystoblast differentiation or bam transcription. Even though the UAS-gbb transgene and the c587 driver for gbb overexpression have been demonstrated to function properly, it is possible that active Gbb proteins are not produced in inner sheath cells and somatic follicle cells because of a lack of proper factors that are required for Gbb translation and processing in those cells, which could explain why the assumed gbb overexpression does not have any effect on cystoblast differentiation. However, since active Dpp proteins can be successfully achieved using the same expression method, and Dpp and Gbb are closely related Bmps, it is unlikely that active Gbb proteins are not produced in inner sheath cells and follicle cells. Alternatively, dpp and
gbb signals could have distinct signaling properties, and
dpp may play a greater role in regulating GSCs and cystoblasts.
Recent studies have indicated that Dpp and Gbb have context-dependent
relationships in wing development. In the wing disc, duplications of dpp are able to rescue many but not all of the phenotypes associated with gbb mutants, suggesting that dpp and gbb have not only partly redundant functions but also distinct signaling properties. In the wing and ovary, gbb and dpp function through two Bmp type I receptors, sax and tkv. The puzzling difference between gbb and dpp could be explained by context-dependent modifications of Bmp proteins, which render different signaling properties in different cell types. It will be of
great future interest to better understand what causes Bmps to have distinct signaling properties (Song, 2004).
All the defined niches share a commonality, structural asymmetry, which
ensures stem cells and their differentiated daughters receive different levels of niche signals. In order for a niche signal to function differently in a stem cell and its immediately differentiating daughter cell that is just one cell away, it has to be short-ranged and localized. This study shows that Bmp signaling mediated by Dpp and Gbb results in preferential expression of pMad and Dad in GSCs. Bmp signaling appears to elicit different levels of responses in GSCs and cystoblasts, suggesting that the cap cells are likely to be a source
for active short-ranged Bmp signals. These observations support the idea that Bmp signals are active only around cap cells. Consistently, when GSCs lose contact with the cap cells following the removal of adherens junctions they move away from the niche and then are lost. As
gbb and dpp mRNAs are broadly expressed in the other somatic
cells of the germarium besides cap cells, localized active Bmp proteins around cap cells could be generated by localized translation and/or activation of Bmp proteins. As they can function as long-range signals, it
remains unclear how Dpp and Gbb act as short-range signals in the GSC
niche (Song, 2004).
Bmp signaling and
bam expression are in direct opposition in Drosophila ovarian
GSCs. bam is actively repressed in GSCs through a defined transcriptional silencer. These observations lead to a model in which Bmp
signals from the niche maintain adjacent germ cells as GSCs by actively
suppressing bam transcription and thus preventing differentiation
into cystoblasts. The levels of pMad are correlated with the
amount of bam transcriptional repression in GSCs and cystoblasts. In the wild-type germarium, pMad is highly expressed in GSCs and some cystoblasts where bam is repressed. In other cystoblasts and differentiated germline cysts, pMad is reduced to very low levels, and thus bam transcriptional repression is relieved. In the GSCs mutant for dpp, gbb or punt, pMad levels are severely reduced, and bam begins to be expressed. The repression of bam transcription as a result of dpp overexpression seems to be a rapid process; bam mRNA is reduced to below detectable levels two hours after dpp is overexpressed. This suggests that repression of bam transcription by Bmp signaling could be direct. Furthermore, Med and Mad can
bind to the defined bam silencer in vitro, which also supports the
idea that Bmp signaling acts directly to repress bam transcription.
Dpp signaling has also been shown to repress brinker (brk) expression in the wing imaginal disc and in the embryo. The
repression of brk expression by Dpp signaling is mediated by the
direct binding of Mad and Med to a silencer element in the brk
promoter. Since the brk silencer is very similar to the
bam silencer, the results suggest that bam repression in
GSCs is also mediated directly by Dpp and Gbb in a similar manner (Song, 2004).
It remains unclear how the binding of Med and Mad to the bam
silencer results in bam transcriptional repression in GSCs. For the
brk silencer, Dpp signaling and Shn are both required to repress
brk expression in the Drosophila wing disc and embryo. Mad and Med belong to the Smad protein family, which are known to function as
transcriptional activators by recruiting co-activators with histone
acetyltransferase activity. In the wing disc, Shn is proposed to function as a switch factor that converts
the activating property of Mad and Med proteins into a transcriptional
repressor property. Possibly, the Mad-Med complex could also recruit Shn to the bam repressor element. Consistent with the possible role of Shn in repressing bam expression in GSCs is the observation that GSCs that lose shn function differentiate, and thus are lost.
Also, it remains possible that Mad and Med could recruit a repressor other
than Shn when binding to the bam repressor element. In the future, it will be very important to determine whether Shn itself is a co-repressor for Mad/Med proteins or whether it directly recruits a co-repressor to repress bam transcription in GSCs (Song, 2004).
Stem cells are responsible for replacing damaged or dying cells in various adult tissues throughout a lifetime. They possess great potential for future regenerative medicine and gene therapy. However, the mechanisms governing stem cell regulation are poorly understood. Germline stem cells (GSCs) in the Drosophila testis have been shown to reside in niches, and thus these represent an excellent system for studying relationships between niches and stem cells. Bmp signals from somatic cells are essential for maintaining GSCs in the Drosophila testis. Somatic cyst cells and hub cells express two Bmp molecules, Gbb and Dpp. Genetic analysis indicates that gbb functions cooperatively with dpp to maintain male GSCs, although gbb alone is essential for GSC maintenance. Furthermore, mutant clonal analysis shows that Bmp signals directly act on GSCs and control their maintenance. In GSCs defective in Bmp signaling, expression of bam is upregulated, whereas forced bam expression in GSCs causes the GSCs to be lost. This study demonstrates that Bmp signals from the somatic cells maintain GSCs, at least in part, by repressing bam expression in the Drosophila testis. dpp signaling is known to be essential for maintaining GSCs in the Drosophila ovary. This study further suggests that both Drosophila male and female GSCs use Bmp signals to maintain GSCs (Kawase, 2004).
To determine the sources for Gbb and Dpp in the testis, RT-PCR was used to study the presence of gbb and dpp mRNAs in the purified hub
cells, somatic cyst cells and germ cells using fluorescent-activated cell
sorting (FACS). The hub cells were marked by the upd-gal4 driven
UAS-GFP expression. The somatic cyst cells and somatic stem cells were marked by the c587-gal4-driven UAS-GFP. vasa is a germline-specific gene. The germ cells were marked by a vasa-GFP transgene. The tips of the
testes were isolated and dissociated, and the GFP-positive cells were purified
from the dissociated testicular cells by FACS. As a control, vasa
mRNAs were present in the whole testis and isolated germ cells but were absent in the somatic cyst cells and hub cells. Interestingly,
gbb and dpp mRNAs were present in the hub cells and the
somatic cysts/somatic stem cells but were absent in the germ cells. In addition, dpp mRNAs appeared to be less abundant than gbb mRNAs in the
testis. These results indicate that both Dpp and Gbb are probably somatic
cell-derived Bmp signals that directly regulate GSC maintenance in the
testis (Kawase, 2004).
Home page: The Interactive Fly © 1995, 1996 Thomas B. Brody, Ph.D.
The Interactive Fly resides on the
decapentaplegic:
Biological Overview
| Evolutionary Homologs
| Targets of activity
| Protein Interactions
| Post-transcriptional Regulation
| Developmental Biology
| Effect of mutation
| References
Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.