ovarian tumor
A genomic DNA fragment bearing the otu promoter restores fertility to mutants of the ovarian tumor
locus (otu) of Drosophila. Germ-line transformants bearing this fragment express OTU
mRNA with the same tissue specificity as the wild-type otu gene, and at comparable levels.
Transcription from the otu promoter, P(otu), which lacks a TATA element, appears to be initiated at
multiple transcription start points (tsp) within an 80-bp region. Deletion of sequences upstream of the
tsp indicates that a region between nucleotides -190 and -310 is required for proper expression of
the otu gene. A DNA fragment containing 452 bp upstream and 126 bp downstream from the tsp is
able to direct expression of the Escherichia coli lacZ gene in the germ cells of the ovary and testis,
indicating that cis-acting regulatory elements governing these expression patterns are located in a
578-bp region surrounding the multiple tsp (Comer, 1992).
The ovo+ and ovarian tumor+ (otu) genes function in the germline sex determination pathway in Drosophila,
but the hierarchical relationship between them is unknown. Increased ovo+ copy number
results in increased ovarian tumor expression in the female germline and increased ovo expression in
the male germline. Males with two or three copies of ovo+ show increased staining activity in the apex of the testis. The zone of expression does not extend into the region of advanced primary spermatocytes, suggesting that the regulation of germline OVO mRNA abundance and the regulation of stage-specific expression are distinct. The correlation between ovo+ copy number and the degree of transactivation of a reporter, strongly suggests that ovo+ is autoregulated in the male germline, either directly or indirectly (Lu, 1998).
The bacterially expressed Ovo
zinc-finger domain binds to multiple sites at or near the ovo and ovarian tumor promoters. This strongly
suggests that Ovo is directly autoregulatory and that ovarian tumor is a direct downstream target of
ovo in the germline sex determination hierarchy. Both positive and negative regulation by Ovo
proteins appear likely, depending on promoter context and on the sex of the fly. The most striking observation is the presence in females of protected regions overlapping the ovo-B transcription initiation site, and near the major start sites for the otu promoter. In the case of the ovo-B promoter, the protected region is no more than about 10 base pairs from the three principle start sites and extends about 23 bp downstream of these start sites. Both appear to be high affinity sites based on DNase protection and gel shift assays. There are three binding sites located between the ovo-A and ovo-B transcription start sites. Additional binding sites are found upstream from the ovo-A promoter and downstream of the ovo-B promoter. Two sites between the ovo-A and the ovo-B promoters show high binding activity. Two Ovo-binding sites upstream of the otu promoters are found at positions 370-389 and 401-422 in a region required for otu+ function in vivo (Lu, 1998).
Sequence alignment reveal an 11-bp consensus sequence located centrally within each of the nine binding sites. The strong binding site at the ovo-B promoter has a direct repeat separated by a single G residue. The first A residue in this sequece is the Ovo-B transcripiton start site.
The observation that
two strong Ovo-binding sites are at the initiator of the TATA-less ovo-B and ovarian tumor promoters
raises the possibility that Ovo proteins influence the nucleation of transcriptional pre-initiation
complexes (Lu, 1998).
Three Ovo-binding sites exist in a compact
regulatory region that controls germline expression of the
otu gene. Interestingly, the strongest Ovo-binding site
is very near the otu transcription start, where basal
transcriptional complexes must function. Loss-of-function,
gain-of-function and promoter swapping constructs
demonstrate that Ovo binding near the transcription start
site is required for Ovo-dependent otu transcription in
vivo. These data unambiguously identify otu as a direct
Ovo target gene and raise the tantalizing possibility that
an Ovo site, at the location normally occupied by basal
components, functions as part of a specialized core
promoter (Lu, 2001).
An extensive set of transgenes have been prepared
with deleted and reconstituted Ovo-binding sites, which were
tested in females with differing doses of ovo+ . Removal of
Ovo-binding sites reduces or eliminates the response to ovo+
activity in trans, while reconstituting Ovo-binding sites
confers activity. These data indicate that Ovo protein
directly regulates otu transcription (Lu, 2001).
Surprisingly, Ovo functions very close to the transcription
start site of otu. Ovo footprints within 20 bp of the
transcription start sites of all but one of the reporter genes that
respond to ovo dose in trans. Indeed, in the case of the ovo-B
promoter, the transcription start site is in the middle of the
region protected by Ovo. It is a reasonable assumption that
RNA Polymerase II and basal transcription complex
components also bind this region. For example, the
TFIID complex protects about 60 bp, centered on the core
promoter. Certainly, RNA Polymerase II must contact the +1
position in the ovo-B promoter that is covered by Ovo protein
in vitro (Lu, 2001).
A standard model for transcriptional regulation holds that
the binding of regulatory factors at control regions modulates
the transcriptional activity of a variety of core promoters. In
this model, core promoters (where the start site is +1 and the
core promoter is from -35 to +35) can have different basal
strengths, but they have little regulatory information. While in
many cases different core promoters respond similarly to a
given enhancer, there is some evidence supporting the idea that
core promoters can bear important regulatory information. These
data suggest that the ovo-B and otu core promoters have a
regulatory function. Several possible mechanistic
explanations for the promoter proximal binding of Ovo to
these core promoters has been explored (Lu, 2001).
Binding of a regulatory protein to the transcription start site
is unusual. There are only a few core-promoter binding
proteins, such as AEF1 and YY1, that function in tissue or
promoter-specific transcriptional control. Binding a short distance away from the
transcription start is more common. Start sites are not often
mapped to the base. Thus, a trivial explanation of the effect of
promoter proximal binding of Ovo is that it binds near the start
sites, but not at them. This is unlikely. For example, two groups have mapped
the ovo-B transcription start site to the same location. Full-length
cDNAs, showing evidence of 5' caps, also end at this
site. The sequenced RACE product from the otu::lacZ swb transgene ends precisely at the same site. Similarly, the otu transcription start sites have been mapped by primer extension and by RACE. The otu start sites in reporter genes are within 20 bp upstream of the Ovo footprints, well within the
region expected to bind basal factors. Thus, Ovo and basal
transcription factors occupy the same region of the otu core
promoter, concurrently or in series (Lu, 2001).
The concurrent occupancy model for Ovo function at the
core promoter places Ovo in the basal transcriptional
apparatus. Core promoters typically have binding sites for
basal factors at characteristic locations. The best-studied site is
the TATA element at about -30 to -25, but about half of
Drosophila genes are TATA-less. In addition, Initiator elements (Inr) at the transcription start site, and downstream promoter elements (DPE) at about +28 to +34
have been described. The proteins that bind core promoter sites
are components of the enormous pre-initiation complex,
TFIID, which protects the entire 60 bp core promoter region. The combinatorial binding of TFIID components to characteristically spaced sequence elements provides enhanced specificity and binding strength. Ovo could function as a
tissue-specific core element to augment TFIID binding, but this
seems unlikely for three reasons. (1) The Ovo-binding site
is slightly downstream of the otu start site, but overlaps the
ovo-B initiation site. A more constrained
position relative to the start site would be expected. (2) The promoter proximal
Ovo binding sites at otu and ovo-B are in opposite orientation.
Transcription is certainly directional. If Ovo serves to orient
the complex at the transcription start site in a manner analogous
to TATA, Inr and DPE elements, then directionality would be
expected. To account for function in each orientation, Ovo
would need a flexible domain between the DNA binding and
complex contact domains, or a highly symmetrical structure
outside the DNA-binding domain. (3) Tests were performed for
dose-dependent genetic interactions between ovoD and
mutations in the Drosophila TBP associated factors (TAFs)
that are components of TFIID. Mutations in any of several TAFs fail to interact with ovoD. This is a circumstantial argument against an
intimate relationship between Ovo and TFIID (Lu, 2001).
If Ovo and basal factors occupy the otu core promoter
serially, orientation and spacing issues are less important. Ovo
binding might alter the structure of the core promoter to make
it more accessible to transcription initiation complexes. There
is precedent for preconditioning a core promoter. For example,
a bent configuration can enhance the binding of TBP to
the TATA element. Similarly, RNA Polymerase II can initiate from a melted or negatively supercoiled core promoter in the absence of the normal stable
of transcription factors. Thus, Ovo could precondition the core promoter to allow stronger and/or more precise subsequent binding by the transcriptional apparatus, by
generating or stabilizing bends or single stranded regions (Lu, 2001).
Indeed, retrotransposon targeting suggests that the ovo-B
promoter has an unusual structure. The ovo-B promoter region,
and the Ovo-binding sites in particular, are preferred targets
for de-novo gypsy-transposon insertion. Transposable element targeting is
believed to be sensitive to chromatin structure in many systems. It is thus possible that Ovo binding makes the chromatin especially available for
gypsy insertion. Such accessibility could also promote the entry
of transcriptional machinery. Finally, the presence of bound
Ovo might even circumvent the need for TFIID. The YY-1
protein, also a C2H2-zinc-finger protein that binds core
promoters, binds double-stranded DNA and a single-stranded bubble in the direction of transcription. YY-1 binding and RNA Polymerase II, but not TFIID, are sufficient
for transcription from those core promoters in vitro. In summary, while there is no
mechanistic understanding of Ovo function at the core promoter, it seems likely that Ovo and components of the machinery performing the work of transcription bind to the
same sequence, but not at the same time (Lu, 2001).
The Drosophila gene stand still (stil) encodes a novel
protein required for survival, sexual identity and
differentiation of female germ cells. The Stil protein accumulates in
the nucleus of all female germ cells throughout
development, and is transiently expressed during early
stages of male germline differentiation. Changes of Stil
subnuclear localization during oogenesis suggest an
association with chromatin. Several mutant alleles, which
are point mutations in the Stil N-terminal domain, encode
proteins that no longer co-localize with chromatin. Stil binds to many sites on polytene
chromosomes with strong preference for decondensed
chromatin. This localization is very similar to that of RNA
polymerase II. Stil is required for high levels
of transcription of the ovarian tumor gene in germ cells.
Expression of ovarian tumor in somatic cells can be
induced by ectopic expression of Stil. Ubiquitous somatic expression of Stil results in
lethality of the fly at all stages of development (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
Germline sex determination is controlled by both cell-autonomous
(germ cell intrinsic components) and non-cell-autonomous
factors (somatic signals). Candidate genes
involved in germline sex determination might be identified on
the basis of two mutant phenotypes: the disappearance of germ
cells in a sex-specific manner and the differentiation of
chromosomally female (2X/2A) germ cells as male germ cells.
Genetic analyses have shown that the three genes ovo, ovarian
tumor (otu), and stand still (stil) meet both criteria. They are
required only in females for survival of the germ cells,
establishment of their sexual identity, and oogenesis. In addition to the
similar phenotypes shown by mutations in these three genes,
genetic interactions between them have been demonstrated.
The phenotype of females bearing dominant female-sterile
alleles of ovo, ovoD, is sensitive to the gene dosage of otu and
stil, such that decreased amounts of these genes lead to
enhancement and increased gene doses to partial suppression
of the phenotype. These genetic interactions suggest that the otu, ovo
and stil genes function in a common pathway, or in closely
linked parallel pathways, involved in the survival and
differentiation of the female germline (Sahut-Barnola, 1999 and references).
During embryogenesis, the Stil protein is first detectable at
stage 11 in the nucleus of germ cells, soon after their migration
through the midgut epithelium, but before their separation into
two groups. This is very soon after germ cells becomes
competent for RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. At stage 11, the staining is very faint,
but becomes strong by stage 13. Double staining with
antibodies against the Vasa and Stil proteins shows that all
germ cells express Stil. No evidence has been found
for either sex-specific expression during embryogenesis or
expression in somatic tissues. During the first and second larval instar, Stil protein is
found in the nucleus of all germ cells in both sexes.
A difference between males and females first becomes
apparent during the third larval stage. All female germ cells,
which are located in the middle part of larval ovaries, show
strong staining. In adult ovaries, Stil expression is
maintained in all germ cells. By contrast, Stil is
present only during some stages of male germline
differentiation. At the testis apex, Stil expression is
low in stem cells and dividing spermatogonia. In newly formed
16-cell cysts of primary spermatocytes, Stil staining is as
strong as that found in female germ cells, but then quickly
vanishes during the spermatocyte growth phase. This pattern
of expression is also found in adult testes, which have the
same apical-distal organization. Larval fat bodies
show low levels of Stil expression (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
An adult ovary is composed of about 16 egg assembly lines
called ovarioles. A special region, the germarium, lies near the
anterior end of an ovariole. Two to three germline stem cells
are located at the anterior end of a germarium. A germline stem
cell divides asymmetrically to produce a new stem cell and a
cystoblast, which then undergoes four rounds of synchronous
incomplete mitotic divisions forming a cluster of 16
interconnected cystocytes. One of the 16 cells becomes the
oocyte and the 15 others differentiate into nurse cells. The 16-cell cyst, surrounded by a layer of somatic follicle cells, leaves
the germarium and undergoes final differentiation.
In adults, Stil is present in the nucleus of all
female germline-derived cells, including the oocyte. Staining
of the oocyte nucleus is detected transiently, from stage 1 to
10 of oogenesis, and is weak compared to staining in nurse cell
nuclei. After stage 10, staining is observed only in
nurse cell nuclei and disappears when they degenerate. The oocyte cytoplasm presents no detectable level of
Stil protein, irrespective of the developmental stage, indicating
that most of the Stil protein is not transferred from the nurse
cells to the oocyte, and that what is transferred is trapped in
the oocyte nucleus (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
Given the similar phenotypes exhibited by mutations in stil,
ovo and otu, as well as the genetic interactions between them,
it is likely that these genes function in a common pathway, or
in parallel pathways, to determine germline survival and sexual
identity. A common pathway is
supported by the finding that high levels of otu expression
requires ovo gene activity. An
investigation was therefore carried out to see whether Stil controls the expression of the ovo and
otu genes. The expression of three constructs
containing parts of the ovo gene fused to a lacZ reporter gene
was analyzed in gonads of
wild-type, stil heterozygous and stil homozygous or
hemizygous flies. No effect of stil gene dosage is found
on expression of the ovo::lacZ reporter genes.
To determine the effect of stil mutations on otu
expression, antibodies against the Otu proteins were used as well as an otu::lacZ reporter, which contains
the 5' region and the first untranslated exon of the otu gene. Using Otu antibodies in wild-type or in
stil heterozygous backgrounds, a cytoplasmic
staining was observed in all the germ cells in ovaries and in stem cells and
dividing spermatogonia at the apex of testes. In
stil mutant ovaries, in which only a few cells are present, a strong reduction in the intensity of Otu antibody
staining was seen. However, it is difficult to be sure that the
reduction of staining is due to decreased expression of otu and
not to the fact that the mutant cells are unhealthy and dying.
In males, stil mutant germ cells are completely healthy. A strong reduction of the intensity of Otu antibody
staining has been found at the apex of stil mutant testes.
Experiments using the otu::lacZ transgene give the same
results. In wild-type and in stil heterozygotes, expression of
otu::lacZ is restricted to the apex of testes. In stil
mutant testes, beta-galactosidase expression is almost
undetectable. These results show that transcription
of the otu gene in male and female germ cells is regulated by
Stil (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
The ovo gene products are
positive regulators of otu expression and the Ovo zinc-finger
domain binds specifically to several sites at the otu
promoter. Thus it is possible that Ovo and Stil work together at the otu
promoter. One way to get a hint of such a cooperation is to
combine ovo and stil mutations and to test the consequence on
otu expression. An effect of stil+ gene dosage
is observed in a background in which otu transcription is strongly impaired
by a dominant antimorphic mutation of ovo. In ovaries
heterozygous for ovoD2, expression of otu::lacZ is almost
completely abolished. Expression of
the otu::lacZ transgene is partially restored by the addition
of an extra wild-type copy of the stil gene. Phenotypic
analysis has shown that the ovoD2 mutation can be partially
suppressed by increasing the dosage of stil+. These results suggest that this phenotypic
improvement is in part due to restoration of otu expression. Ectopic Stil can induce the transcription of otu in tissues other than the
germline. However, this ectopic activation is rather inefficient,
despite the fact that the amount of ectopic Stil artificially induced in follicle cells
is similar to the amount present in germ cells. This suggests that the somatic follicle cells may not contain all
the components needed for full activity of Stil (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
One striking observation described in this article is the
widespread association of the Stil protein to chromatin.
Analysis of polytene chromosomes, either after ectopic
expression in salivary glands or in nurse cells that normally
express stil, reveals that Stil is preferentially associated with
regions of decondensed chromatin (interbands), including
puffs. This localization is very similar to that found for RNA
polymerase II (Pol II), in particular the form of the enzyme in which its largest subunit is in a hypophosphorylated state. A co-localization
of Stil and Pol II on polytene chromosomes is
consistent with the observation that Stil controls the
transcription of the otu gene. The numerous binding sites
suggest that Stil probably contributes to the regulation of many
genes in the germline (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
The importance for germ cell development of proteins that
show broad association with chromatin and may exert a general
effect on Pol II activity has recently be documented,
particularly in Caenorhabditis elegans. For example, the
product of the pie gene contains two putative zinc-finger motifs
and is required during early embryogenesis to repress overall
Pol II transcription in germline precursor cells and to prevent
them from differentiating as somatic cells. The effect of PIE-1 appears to be
mediated by prevention of phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal
repeat domain of the largest Pol II subunit. Even more striking is the case of the mes-2, mes-3, mes-4
and mes-6 genes. Maternal-effect mutations in these four genes
lead to healthy but sterile offspring characterized by post-embryonic
degeneration of the germline. The sex-karyotype of
the germ cells is critical for the expressivity of the phenotype,
since worms bearing 2 X chromosomes are much more
sensitive to these mutations than worms bearing a single X
chromosome, regardless of the sexual identity of the soma or
of the germline. This karyotype-dependent
requirement is very similar to that found for ovo in
Drosophila, except that ovo shows zygotic, not maternal,
requirement. A link to gene regulation at
the level of chromatin structure became plausible when MES-2
and MES-6 were found to be homologous (respectively) to two members
of the Polycomb group proteins, Enhancer of zeste and Extra
sex combs. Polycomb group proteins are involved in gene silencing
in various situations (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
In C. elegans, transgenes arranged in
large repetitive arrays are usually active in somatic cells, but
silenced in germ cells, a phenomenon that is attributed to
some unknown particularity of chromatin organization in the
germline. This hypothesis received strong
support with the recent observation that silenced transgenes
can be reactivated by mutations in the four mes genes listed
above.
Finally, proteins involved in higher-order chromatin
structure are also important in the process of sex determination
in mammals: male-to-female sex reversal phenotype has been
observed in mice mutant for the M33 gene, a homolog of
Polycomb.
These examples are meant to stress the likely
importance of global gene regulation and higher-order
chromatin structure in the development of germ cells, as well
as in the establishment of particular cell fate such as sexual
identity. In the case of Drosophila, genetic interactions
between some alleles of ovo and mutations of either Polycomb or polycomb-like also point to a role of higher-order chromatin
structure in germline sexual identity and differentiation. Given
the evidence of a genetic interaction between ovo and stil, and the extensive chromatin
association described here, it is plausible that Stil has
a rather general effect on transcription. The difference between
female and male germ cells would be determined by the
interaction with sex-specific partners or by post-translational
modifications possibly controlled by the feminizing somatic
signals (Sahut-Barnola, 1999).
Ovo controls germline and epidermis differentiation in
flies and mice. In the Drosophila germline, alternative
Ovo-B and Ovo-A isoforms have a common DNA-binding
domain, but different N-termini. These
isoforms are transcription factors with opposite regulatory
activities. Using yeast one-hybrid assays, a
strong activation domain was identified within a common region and a
counteracting repression domain within the Ovo-A-specific
region. To identify and map Ovo
transcriptional effector domains, the effect of
fusion proteins on reporter gene expression was monitored. In flies, Ovo-B positively regulates the
ovarian tumor promoter, while Ovo-A is a negative
regulator of the ovarian tumor and ovo promoters. Ovo-B
isoforms supply ovo+ function in the female germline and
epidermis, while Ovo-A isoforms have dominant-negative
activity in both tissues. Moreover, elevated expression of
Ovo-A results in maternal-effect lethality while the
absence of Ovo-A results in maternal-effect sterility. These
data indicate that tight regulation of antagonistic Ovo-B
and Ovo-A isoforms is critical for germline formation and
differentiation (Andrews, 2000).
The function of ovo in, and for, female
germline development appears to be
relatively straight forward. The
data indicate that Ovo-B supplies the
essential ovo + function in the female
germline. This is fully consistent with the
expression of Ovo-B isoforms early in
oogenesis where ovo + activity is required.
Genetic and molecular data indicate that ovo plus
acts upstream of otu + and
ultimately Sxl +.
Ovo-B positively regulates otu transcription
in the female germline, suggesting that part
of the function of Ovo-B is to up-regulate
Otu production. There are at least three
known positive regulators of otu promoter
activity: ovo;
somatic signals, and stand still (stil).
While it is not known how Ovo-B activates
otu in conjunction with these other regulators,
Stil is a germline restricted chromatin
associated protein that is present at
cytological sites of transcription. Thus, Stil and
Ovo-B may act directly at the promoter.
The somatic sex determination signals that
influence otu expression are undefined.
Whereas maternal Ovo-A is required for
the germline of the progeny, it is extremely
toxic when produced during early oogenesis (Andrews, 2000).
Alternative splicing is used by metazoans to increase protein diversity and to alter gene expression during development. However, few factors that control splice site choice in vivo have been identified. Half pint (Hfp; FlyBase designation Poly-U-binding splicing factor) regulates RNA splicing in Drosophila. Females harboring hypomorphic mutations in hfp lay short eggs and show defects in germline mitosis, nuclear morphology, and RNA localization during oogenesis. hfp encodes the Drosophila ortholog of human PUF60 and functions in both constitutive and alternative splicing in vivo. In particular, hfp mutants display striking defects in the developmentally regulated splicing of ovarian tumor (otu). Furthermore, transgenic expression of the missing otu splice form can rescue the ovarian phenotypes of hfp. hfp is also required for efficient splicing of gurken mRNA and in the splicing of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), which binds to the seven-methylguanosine cap at the 5' end of messenger RNAs and is a limiting factor in translation initiation (Van Buskirk, 2002).
The polytene nurse cell chromosome morphology of hfp mutants is strikingly similar to that observed in females mutant for certain alleles of ovarian tumor (otu). otu also plays a role in germline cell division, as otu egg chambers can have too few or too many germline cells. The otu transcript is subject to alternative splicing, resulting in the production of a 98 kDa protein and a less abundant 104 kDa protein (Otu104), depending on the incorporation of a 126 bp alternatively spliced exon. The biochemical functions of the Otu isoforms are unknown, but they share an N terminus that contains a cysteine protease-like domain and a C terminus that possesses weak similarity to microtubule-associated proteins. Intriguingly, the alternatively spliced exon encodes a tudor domain, a sequence element found multiply repeated in the Drosophila Tudor protein and also present in proteins with putative RNA binding functions in several species. Genetic and molecular analysis reveal distinct requirements and expression patterns for the two Otu isoforms, suggesting that the splicing of the otu transcript may be developmentally regulated. Indeed, RT-PCR shows that expression of the transcript encoding the 104 kDa isoform is restricted to the early stages of oogenesis (Van Buskirk, 2002).
In order to determine whether the alternative splicing of otu is dependent on hfp function, the expression of otu was examined in hfp mutants. RT-PCR analysis of RNA isolated from early stage egg chambers shows that the relative abundance of the larger otu transcript is decreased in hfp, and Western analysis shows that the levels of the corresponding 104 kDa Otu isoform are significantly decreased. Severe loss of Otu104 activity results in the production of tumorous egg chambers, which are not observed in hfp. Therefore, some residual Otu104 protein must be present, possibly because the hfp mutants represent partial loss-of-function alleles. To determine which, if any, of the hfp phenotypes are due to an effect on otu splicing regulation, a hybrid genomic-cDNA transgene encoding exclusively the 104 kDa Otu isoform was introduced into an hfp mutant background. hfp mutants expressing two copies of the Otu104 transgene produce egg chambers with predominantly wild-type nurse cell nuclear morphology and expression of four copies of the transgene completely rescues the nurse cell and oocyte nuclear morphology as well as the germline division defect. Expression of Otu104 also restores normal grk mRNA localization. This was unexpected, since defects in grk RNA localization have not been previously described in otu mutants, and no grk RNA localization defects are observed in otu7 homozygotes or otu7/otu11 mutants, which give rise to differentiated egg chambers. However, otu11 females, though often producing tumorous germaria, will under certain conditions produce rare eggs, and these show defects, including the expansion of dorsal appendages associated with mislocalization of grk RNA, very similar to those of hfp9 mutant eggs. Interestingly, otu11 is a point mutation in the alternatively spliced exon and hence specifically affects the activity of the 104 kDa Otu isoform (Van Buskirk, 2002).
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, hnRNPs, are RNA-binding proteins that play crucial roles in controlling gene expression. In Drosophila oogenesis, the hnRNP Squid (Sqd) functions in the localization and translational regulation of gurken (grk) mRNA. Sqd interacts with Hrb27C, an hnRNP previously implicated in splicing. Like
sqd, hrb27C mutants lay eggs with dorsoventral defects and
Hrb27C can directly bind to grk RNA. These data demonstrate a novel
role for Hrb27C in promoting grk localization. A
direct physical interaction is also observed between Hrb27C and Ovarian tumor (Otu), a cytoplasmic protein implicated in RNA localization. Some
otu alleles produce dorsalized eggs and it appears that Otu
cooperates with Hrb27C and Sqd in the oocyte to mediate proper grk
localization. All three mutants share another phenotype, persistent polytene nurse cell chromosomes. These analyses support dual cooperative roles for Sqd, Hrb27C and Otu during Drosophila oogenesis (Goodrich, 2004).
This study identifies a physical and genetic interaction between Hrb27C and Sqd. The two proteins were previously biochemically purified as part of an hnRNP complex from Drosophila cells, but it
was not known if they interact directly nor had their RNA targets been
isolated. The interaction was originally detected in a two-hybrid screen and it has been confirmed biochemically by co-immunoprecipitation. In vivo, this interaction requires the presence of RNA; this result was unexpected because the yeast two-hybrid constructs that originally revealed the interaction did not contain the RRMs and presumably cannot bind RNA. The interaction may require the full-length proteins to be in unique conformations that are achieved only when they are bound to RNA. The truncated proteins used in the
yeast two-hybrid screen may be folded in such a manner that the
protein-protein interaction domains are exposed even in the absence of RNA
binding, making it possible for the interaction to occur in yeast (Goodrich, 2004).
A striking genetic interaction was detected between Sqd and Hrb27C;
weak hrb27C mutants can strongly enhance the DV defects of weak
sqd mutants. This suggests that the physical interaction has in vivo significance. The phenotypes of sqd and hrb27C place both proteins in a pathway required for proper grk localization and
suggest a previously undetected role for Hrb27C. hrb27C mutants lay
variably dorsalized eggs, and in situ hybridization analysis reveals that
grk RNA is mislocalized. Since the mislocalized RNA in hrb27C mutants is translated, causing a dorsalized egg phenotype, it is likely that Hrb27C also functions with Sqd in regulating Grk protein accumulation. A role in the regulation of RNA localization and translation is novel for Hrb27C/Hrp48; it has been previously described as functioning in the inhibition of IVS3 splicing of P-element encoded transposase (Siebel, 1994; Hammond, 1997). Hrb27C has nuclear functions and has been observed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of somatic and germline cells in embryos (Siebel, 1995). Because Sqd is localized to the oocyte nucleus where it is thought to bind grk RNA, a model is favored where Hrb27C and Sqd bind grk RNA together and are exported possibly as a complex into the cytoplasm (Goodrich, 2004).
Two unpublished studies have implicated Hrb27C in osk RNA
localization (J. Huynh, T. Munro, K. Litière-Smith and D. St Johnston, communication to Goodrich, 2004) and translational regulation (T. Yano, S. Lopez de Quinto, A. Shevenchenko, A. Shevenchenko, T. Matsui and A. Ephrussi, communication to Goodrich, 2004). Translational repression of osk RNA until it is properly localized is essential to prevent disruptions in the posterior
patterning of the embryo. An analogous mechanism of co-regulation of mRNA
localization and translation appears to control Grk expression. Certain
parallels between osk and grk regulation are very striking.
Both RNAs are tightly localized and subject to complex translational
regulation; they also share certain factors that mediate this regulation. In addition to Hrb27C, the translational repressor Bruno appears to be a part of the regulatory complexes that are required for the proper expression of both RNAs. It will be interesting to determine if there are other shared partners that function in the regulation of both RNAs, as well as identify the factors that give each complex its localization specificity (Goodrich, 2004).
Otu is also involved in the localization of grk mRNA and interacts physically with Hrb27C. Though a definitive role of Otu in regulating Grk
expression has not been previously described, Van Buskirk (2002) found that four copies of Otu104 (flies carry a transgene expressing only the 104 kDa isoform of Otu under the control of the otu promoter) are able to rescue the
grk RNA mislocalization defect of half pint (hfp; poly U binding factor 68kD) mutants. Analysis
of the hypomorphic alleles, otu7 and
otu11, reveals a requirement for Otu in localizing
grk RNA for proper DV patterning. Alternative splicing of the
otu transcript produces two protein isoforms: a 98 kDa isoform and a 104 kDa isoform that differ by the inclusion of a 126 bp alternatively spliced exon (6a) in the 104 kDa isoform. This alternatively spliced exon encodes a tudor domain, a sequence element present in proteins with putative RNA-binding abilities. Interestingly, the otu11 allele, which contains a missense mutation in exon 6a, shows the grk localization and dorsalization defect, strongly suggesting that the tudor domain of Otu plays an important function in grk localization. Since otu mutants also show defects in osk localization, it appears that like several other factors, Otu is required for both grk and osk localization. Additionally, Otu has been isolated from cytoplasmic mRNP complexes (Goodrich, 2004).
Surprisingly, an additional shared phenotype of hrb27C,
sqd and otu mutants was found. During early oogenesis, the endoreplicated nurse cell chromosomes are polytene. As they begin to disperse, the chromosomes are visible as distinct masses of blob-like chromatin that completely disperse by stage 6. The formation of polytene nurse cell chromosomes is due to
the endocycling that occurs during early oogenesis. The mechanism of chromosome dispersal is hypothesized to
involve the degradation of securin by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome as a result of separase activity that cleaves cohesin. The significance of chromosome dispersion is not clear, but
it has been suggested that it could facilitate rapid ribosome synthesis. A
defect in the dispersal of polytene chromosomes has been previously described for otu mutants, and both sqd and hrb27C mutants also have nurse cell chromosomes that fail to
disperse. Weak double transheterozygous allele combinations of sqd
and hrb27C produce the persistent polytene nurse cell chromosome
phenotype that is not observed in either of the weak mutants alone. Thus,
genetic and physical interactions between these gene products suggest that
they function together in regulation of this process (Goodrich, 2004).
The failure to disperse nurse cell chromosomes has also been observed in mutants of hfp where the nurse cell nuclear morphology defect is due to improper splicing of Otu104 (Van
Buskirk, 2002). As was shown for hfp,
expressing Otu104 in a sqd mutant background is able to rescue the
polytene nurse cell chromosome phenotype. Although Hfp affects otu splicing, it is not clear how Sqd functions to mediate this phenotype, but
evidence supports a role in Otu104 protein accumulation. The transcript that
encodes Otu104 is clearly present in sqd mutants, as assayed by
RT-PCR, but the level of Otu104 protein is decreased. These results suggest that
the level of Otu104 is crucial to maintaining proper nurse cell chromosome
morphology because the polytene phenotype of sqd mutants can be rescued by
expressing only one extra copy of Otu104 and the majority of egg chambers from
females heterozygous for otu13, otu11, or a
deficiency lacking otu, have nurse cell chromosomes that fail to
disperse (Goodrich, 2004).
The reduced level of Otu104 in sqd mutants raises the possibility that Sqd could translationally regulate otu RNA and that the polytene nurse cell phenotype may be a result of the decreased level of Otu104. Alternatively, Sqd and Hrb27C could form a complex that recruits and stabilizes Otu104 protein, and this complex in turn functions directly or indirectly to regulate chromosome dispersion. An indirect role seems more likely, given that Otu has never been observed in the nucleus. Since Otu104 can rescue the phenotype of sqd mutants
and Otu and Hrb27C co-precipitate, it seems plausible that Sqd and
Hrb27C interact with Otu in the nurse cell cytoplasm to affect an RNA target that could then mediate chromosome dispersion (Goodrich, 2004).
The genetic data support a model in which Sqd, Hrb27C, and Otu function
together in a complex that affects at least two processes during oogenesis: DV
patterning within the oocyte and mediation of nurse cell chromosome
dispersion. Although the biochemical data are consistent with this model, it is also possible that Hrb27C and Sqd could form a complex that is distinct from a complex containing Hrb27C and Otu. However, the in vivo genetic interactions and mutant phenotypes reveal that all three proteins affect both processes and favor a model in which all three proteins function in one complex (Goodrich, 2004).
These results allow expansion upon the model proposed by Norvell (1999) for the regulation of grk RNA expression. Sqd and Hrb27C
associate with grk RNA in the oocyte nucleus. Hrb27C and Sqd remain
associated with grk in the cytoplasm where Otu and possibly other
unidentified proteins associate with the complex as necessary to properly
localize, anchor and translationally regulate grk RNA. A likely
candidate to be recruited to the complex is Bruno, which interacts with Sqd (Norvell, 1999). Although the RNA target of Sqd, Hrb27C and Otu in the nurse cells is not known, the proteins may form a complex composed of different accessory factors to regulate localization and/or translation of RNAs encoding proteins that affect chromosome morphology (Goodrich, 2004).
Although Hrb27C, Sqd and Otu function together to affect different
processes in the oocyte and the nurse cells, they probably function to mediate the precise spatial and temporal regulation of a target RNA that is unique to each cell type where the presence of additional factors would provide specificity to each complex. The importance of the precise localization and translational regulation of grk is well defined, and Hrb27C and Otu have not been identified as additional proteins that facilitate these processes. The transition from polytene to dispersed chromosomes in the nurse cells is less well characterized, but most probably requires precise spatial
and temporal regulation as well. A complex containing Sqd, Hrb27C and Otu
could function to ensure that the target RNA is properly localized and
functional in the nurse cells only at the proper stage of development to
promote chromosome dispersal (Goodrich, 2004).
Continued: see Regulation part 2/2
ovarian tumor:
Biological Overview
| Developmental Biology
| Effects of Mutation
| References
Home page: The Interactive Fly © 1997 Thomas B. Brody, Ph.D.
The Interactive Fly resides on the
Society for Developmental Biology's Web server.